It was a little covered story and from a legal standpoint not a particularly noteworthy result. But Chief Justice Roberts, in a rare “in-chambers opinion” (a writing accompanying a circuit justice’s solo order), denied emergency relief to Peter Navarro—who had sought to be kept out on bail while he appeals his conviction for contempt of Congress. Chief Justice Roberts’s decision was the first in-chambers opinion since 2014(!). This might this be a good opportunity for all judges to reflect on how they might improve their own judicial practice. Procedural fairness research shows that explanations are an important component to achieving litigant satisfaction. No explanation leaves a litigant to wonder why and that wondering can be destructive. “I lost because the judge was a woman” “I lost because that judge was (or is) a Republican”. Etc. So good for you Chief Justice Roberts!  Hopefully your decision to include an albeit brief explanation will motivate other judges as well.